RESUMO
Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a serious mood disorder and leading cause of disability. Despite treatment advances, approximately 30% of individuals with MDD do not achieve adequate clinical response. Better understanding the biological mechanism(s) underlying clinical response to specific psychopharmacological interventions may help fine tune treatments in order to further modulate their underlying mechanisms of action. However, little is known regarding the effect of non-pharmacological treatments (NPTs) on candidate molecular biomarker levels in MDD. This review aims to identify molecular biomarkers that may elucidate NPT response for MDD. Methods: We performed a systematic review and a multilevel linear mixed-effects meta-analyses, and a meta-regression. Searches were performed in PubMed, Scopus, and PsycINFO in October 2020 and July 2021. Results: From 1387 retrieved articles, 17 and six studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analyses, respectively. Although there was little consensus associating molecular biomarker levels with symptomology and/or treatment response, brain metabolites accessed via molecular biomarker-focused neuroimaging techniques may provide promising information on whether an individual with MDD would respond positively to NPTs. Furthermore, non-invasive brain stimulation interventions significantly increased the expression of neurotrophic factors (NTFs) compared to sham/placebo, regardless of add-on pharmacological treatment. Conclusions: NTFs are candidate biomarkers to fine-tune NIBS for MDD treatment. (AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Transtorno Depressivo Maior , Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental , Biomarcadores , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica , Fatores de Crescimento NeuralRESUMO
Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a serious mood disorder and leading cause of disability. Despite treatment advances, approximately 30% of individuals with MDD do not achieve adequate clinical response. Better understanding the biological mechanism(s) underlying clinical response to specific psychopharmacological interventions may help fine tune treatments in order to further modulate their underlying mechanisms of action. However, little is known regarding the effect of non-pharmacological treatments (NPTs) on candidate molecular biomarker levels in MDD. This review aims to identify molecular biomarkers that may elucidate NPT response for MDD. Methods: We performed a systematic review and a multilevel linear mixed-effects meta-analyses, and a meta-regression. Searches were performed in PubMed, Scopus, and PsycINFO in October 2020 and July 2021. Results: From 1387 retrieved articles, 17 and six studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analyses, respectively. Although there was little consensus associating molecular biomarker levels with symptomology and/or treatment response, brain metabolites accessed via molecular biomarker-focused neuroimaging techniques may provide promising information on whether an individual with MDD would respond positively to NPTs. Furthermore, non-invasive brain stimulation interventions significantly increased the expression of neurotrophic factors (NTFs) compared to sham/placebo, regardless of add-on pharmacological treatment. Conclusions: NTFs are candidate biomarkers to fine-tune NIBS for MDD treatment.
RESUMO
Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored mucin-like glycoproteins from Trypanosoma cruzi trypomastigotes (tGPI-mucins) activate macrophages in vitro to produce proinflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and nitric oxide. These effects of tGPI-mucins may be important in the ensuing immune response to T. cruzi. Here, we have sought evidence for a role of tGPI-mucins in mediating leukocyte recruitment in vivo. tGPI-mucins are highly effective in promoting cell recruitment in the pleural cavity of mice primed with IFN-gamma-inducing agents but not in naïve mice. Maximal recruitment was observed at a dose between 250 and 1250 ng tGPI-mucins. There was a significant elevation in the levels of MCP-1 in the pleural cavity of primed animals injected with tGPI-mucins, and in vivo neutralization of MCP-1 abolished leukocyte recruitment. Pretreatment with anti-MIP-1alpha or anti-RANTES had no effect on the recruitment induced by tGPI-mucins. MCP-1 immunoreactivity was detected in pleural macrophages, and macrophages produced MCP-1 in vitro, especially after priming with IFN-gamma. Finally, tGPI-mucins induced significant leukocyte recruitment in primed C3H/HeJ but not in TLR2-deficient mice. Together, our results suggest that T. cruzi-derived GPI-mucins in conjunction with IFN-gamma may drive tissue chemokine production and inflammation and bear a significant role in the pathogenesis of Chagas disease.